Prince William County 2012 Strategic Plan
| Prince William County is a premier community where we treasure our past and the promise of our future. We are diverse and dynamic with a thriving economy where citizens and businesses grow and succeed together. We are a global technology leader for the 21st century. |
That's the vision of the county, adopted on On April 3, 2001 by the Board of County Supervisors. The supervisors elected in November, 2007 are working to adopt a new 2008-2012 strategic plan to replace the current FY 2004-08 Strategic Plan for Prince William County.
So Where Are We Going?
July 26, 2008: The Washington Post article Supervisors Consider Retooling County's Vision reports that the County wants to transform the Strategic Plan from a “functional to transformative” policy. (Click here to view the dictionary definition for "transformative.")
The Strategic Plan is important because it drives the budget. Categories that are named as primary goals in the Strategic Plan are funded; other unnamed categories are pretty much out of luck.
This year the County’s report says that citizen input from a variety of surveys, meetings and written comments, consistently showed four priorities: Education, Environment, Public Safety, and Transportation.
Under the newly proposed “transformative” approach, it appears these citizen priorities would be mixed-and-matched under a few categories with trendy, feel-good names: Sustainable Neighborhoods, Sustainable Families, Sustainable Businesses.
It’s an interesting idea but not a new one. When the last Strategic Plan was finalized in 2003, Supervisors responded to citizens call for the environment as a primary goal by mixing-and-matching environmental needs into “Community Development.” At that time, the Board said that protecting the environment is really a part of everything we do here in Prince William County so it doesn’t need its own category.
However, five years later environmental needs are not only still largely unfunded, they are rarely even considered when plans for locating new schools and roads are finalized. Funding for environmental staff gets nary a mention and citizen calls for County investments in open space preservation are met with dismay.
Mixing-and-matching environmental goals into Community Development was an interesting idea but it didn’t work. In fact, environmentally speaking, we’re in a hole and still digging. It is difficult to understand why the County would consider expanding a failed approach but perhaps some light will shine before the policy is finalized.
Financial constraints are also a large part of the current Strategic Plan debate. County Executive Craig Gerhart has warned Supervisors that the condition of the general fund is going to get worse before it gets better and publicly expressed concern that government may not be able to meet citizens expectations.
Vague goals and confusing policies might take the heat off during tough times, but those “benefits” are short lived at best. Open government, clear policies and accountability are key tools for achieving public goals and should be the foundation of all policies, including the Strategic Plan, in good times and bad.
You can share your views on this topic on our blog, click here to add your comments. |
