Home About Us Calendar Blog Resources Donate
RESOURCES Why Parks & Open Space are Important

Talking Points

Citizen Presentation to the Planning Commission Timeline of Events Parks & Open Space in the News

PARKS, TRAILS & OPEN SPACE

County to Unveil New Parkland Inventory on April 8, 2:00 Board Meeting, McCoart Government Center (or watch on cable channel 23)

We have plenty on parkland on paper.

When the Board of Supervisors voted on February 26 2008 to adopt a new standard of 70 acres per 1,000 residents of parkland generally accessible to the public, the Supervisors had no inventory to assess the impact of their decision. The tricky loophole is that the standard includes private parks, including golf courses, as well as public parks, including those where the County has no opportunity to control public uses or access.

The devil is in the details. Our evaluation, using previously published statistics from the Planning Department and other readily available information, shows that, under this new standard of 70 acres of public "parkland" per 1,000 residents, Prince William County currently exceeds this new parkland standard and will continue to exceed the standard until 2013.

The 2003 Comp Plan standard (13.8 parkland acres/1,000 residents) counted only public parks under county control. Under the old standard, the county should have 5,327 acres of public parks. We were 642 acres short. That's no surprise: the 2007-08 Park Authority Needs Assessment and multiple citizen satisfaction surveys make clear that we need more places where kids and adults can play ball, and more places where people can walk with a dog in the woods near their houses.

The new Parks and Open Space chapter for the Comprehensive Plan lowered the standards for the county because the new standard for parkland (70 acres of parkland/1,000 residents) counts "all parks accessible to the general public." By adopting the new standard, the Board determined the County has an excess of parks and we have immediately exceeded our goal.

By including state and federally owned parkland, golf courses, school grounds and other privately owned "parkland," the new standard creates a paper statistic that does not match reality. Currently Prince William County fares very poorly when compared to both surrounding localities and other localities with comparable populations nationwide. However, this new standard will make it very difficult for the County and others to compare Prince William's parkland amenities to surrounding jurisdictions, who include only county controlled parkland in their progress reports.

Evaluation of Prince William County Parkland by Accountability Standard
Click here to download the Excel spreadsheet.

Year Population - (in thousands) 2003-07 Acreage goal: 13.8 acres/1,000 residents, includes only county-controlled parkland Current PWC Parkland Acres* Privately held parks accessible to the general public Golf Course Acres** School "Parkland" Acres*** Total Parkland Deficit: Parkland Acres to be Acquired Deficit per 1,000 Residents
2007 (December) 386 5,327 4,685 N/A N/A N/A 4,685 642 1.7
2030 555 7,659 4,685 N/A N/A N/A 4,685 2,974 5
 
Year Population (in thousands) 2008 Acreage goal:
70 acres/1,000 residents, includes all parkland accessible to the general public
Current Public Parkland Acres**** Privately held parks accessible to the general public Golf Course Acres** School "Parkland" Acres*** Total Parkland Acreage Generally Accessible to Public Deficit: Parkland Acres to be Acquired Deficit per 1,000 Residents
2007 (December) 386 27,023 26,859 ??? 3,078 733 30,670 -3,647 -9.4
2030 555 38,851 26,859 ??? 3,078 733 30,670 8,181 15
 
Year Population (in thousands)  Acreage goal rejected by BOS :
25 acres/1,000 residents, includes only county-controlled parkland
Current PWC Parkland Acres* Privately held parks accessible to the general public Golf Course Acres** School Ballfield Acres*** Total Parkland Deficit: Parkland Acres to be Acquired Deficit per 1,000 Residents
2007 (December) 386 9,651 4,685 N/A N/A N/A 4,685 4,966 12.4
2030 555 13,875 4,685 N/A N/A N/A 4,685 8,190 17
 
Parkland Acres by Category
Prince William County Parkland Acres
(click here to skip to breakdown of parkland acres)
4,685 acres
Parkland Acres Owned by Others
(click here to skip to breakdown of parkland acres)
22,174 acres
SUB-TOTAL CURRENT PUBLIC PARKLAND ACRES
26,859 acres

Golf Course Acres
Source: Planning Dept. Findings Report
Note: We used the golf course acreage figure from the Findings Report, which does not split out acreage for golf courses that do not allow public access. We reduced this number by 1,000 acres, a guestimate of the acreage at two private golf courses and to avoid double-counting four county managed golf courses.

3,078 acres
School "Parkland" Acres
Source: Planning Dept. Findings Report
733 acres
TOTAL PARKLAND ACREAGE GENERALLY ACCESSIBLE TO PUBLIC
30,670
Chart Showing Parkland Acres
Notes: (1) All figures reflect land acreage and do not include water resources, such as Lake Manassas, the Occoquan Reservoir and the Potomac River; (2) All acreage figures are taken from the Planning Department's Findings Report unless otherwise noted; (3) Dove's Landing, Silver Lake and Featherstone National Wildlife Refuge have been included because all appear to be strong candidates for public access in the near future.
PWC PARKLAND ACRES
County Parks 3,200
PW County Owned Historic Properties 150
Additional land transferred to PWCPA in 2007
Source: Prince William County Park Authority
379
Cunard Park
Source: PWC Mapper
4
Metz Wetland
Source: Wetland Studies & Solutions
217
Bristoe Battlefield (formerly Civil War Preservation Trust) 270
SUB-TOTAL PWC PARKLAND ACRES CURRENTLY OPEN TO PUBLIC USE 4,220
Doves Landing (expected to be open to the public in 2008)
Source: PWC Mapper
235
Silver Lake (expected to be open to the public in 2008)
Source: PWC Mapper
230
TOTAL PWC PARKLAND ACRES 4,685
PARKLAND ACRES OWNED BY OTHERS
NOVA Regional Park Authority Land 81
Leesylvania State Park 490
Manassas National Battlefield 4,391
Prince William Forest Park
Source: Prince William Forest Park
14,558
Occoquan Bay National Wildlife Refuge 636
Featherstone National Wildlife Refuge
Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
338
Conway Robinson State Forest 442
Merrimac Farm
Source: Prince William Conservation Alliance
302
BRMC existing site
Source: Bull Run Mountain Conservancy website
800
Davis Tract (Civil War Preservation Trust)
Source: PWC Mapper
136
Marine Corps Base Quantico:
Due to security restrictions limiting public access, the Planning Dept. recommended excluding the entire Base.
0
TOTAL PARKLAND ACRES OWNED BY OTHERS 22,174

 

Now that the chapter has been adopted:

  1. The Board of County Supervisors should make existing properties available to the public.
    • Approve the Bull Run Mountain Conservancy's proposal to add 270 acres to Silver Lake and open both properties to the public for passive recreation uses - 500 acres.
  2. The Board of County Supervisors should correct the lower-than-average value for parkland contributions provided through the development process. The Planning Department used an estimated cost of $80,000/acre for parkland acquisition during the Parks & Open Space discussions. At a minimum, Prince William's Guidelines for Monetary Contributions should use the same value for an acre for parkland as we use for roads, schools and other public improvements.
  3. The Board of Supervisors should initiate action to develop a trails plan, start acquiring property rights from willing sellers and begin to build trails that are open to the public.
  4. The Planning Department should complete an inventory of all properties owned by Prince William County to determine which should be protected as open space and follow through by placing conservation easements on appropriate properties.
  5. The Planning Department should complete an accurate inventory of public parks, private parks and protected open space. The Board of Supervisor should ensure that the complete inventory is available for public review and add this information to the County Mapper, so citizens can see what Prince William County considers a "park" or "protected open space.�
  6. When the 58-acre Davis Ford Sewage Treatment Facility is no longer needed for sewage treatment, the County should make the land available to the public for passive recreation uses.

February 26 2008 Update
Public Hearing & Board Vote Tonight Tuesday, February 26, 7:30 p.m. at McCoart

Last night the Park Authority presented the results of their 2007 Needs Assessment to the Board of Supervisors. There were no surprises. This study adds one more piece to the growing pile of evidence showing that the majority of Prince William residents strongly support parks, trails and open space... 

  • 74% of respondents said they were willing to pay additional property taxes if it was used only for open space and parkland acquisition in Prince William County;
  • The number one parks and recreation funding priority identified by residents was the acquisition of land to preserve open and green space.

Planning staff has now produced six staff reports as well as a Findings Report. They have inventoried, analyzed and mapped existing public and private parks, recreation facilities and open space and associated land uses. Click here for links to these reports and more information.

The Prince William County Park Authority Board of Directors has passed a resolution supporting high standards for parkland and open space, recommending 25 county-controlled public parkland acres per 1,000 residents.

The Prince William County Planning Commission has passed a resolution supporting high standards for parkland and open space, recommending 25 county-controlled public parkland acres per 1,000 residents. Click here to read the resolution.

Supervisors began the process to strengthen parkland and open space policies in December 2004. During this same time period, more than 21,000 new homes were constructed in Prince William County and our population increased by more than 68,000 residents... the longer we stall, the greater the deficit... the bill to taxpayers just keeps growing.

By delaying this process, we are taking a pass on opportunities to attract funding support for the acquisition of parkland and open space. Just today Governor Kaine announced the distribution of $4,250,002 dollars to fourteen Virginia localities to preserve farmland within their boundaries through local Purchase of Development Rights (PDR) programs.

More opportunities are right around the corner... will Prince William continue to sit on the sidelines or will Supervisors respond to citizen's overwhelming support for parkland and open space acquisition and approve high standards at tonight's public hearing for new parkland and open space policies?

It's time to move on! No more delays, no more deferrals, no more staff reports that rehash the same old information. You can't steer a parked car, so let's get moving!

February 25 2008 Update

Citizens have conveyed strong support for Parks, Trails and Open Space at Public Hearings, community meetings, County surveys, letters to the editor and emails to Supervisors for several years.

However, since 1998, Prince William has acquired only 392 parkland acres. Then, just a few months ago, the Board transferred to the Park Authority an additional 379 acres of land secured through development proffers, raising this total to 771 acres (although there is no information on when or even if this land will be open to public uses).

During this same ten year period, the County's population grew from 268,894 residents to 386,047 residents... that's nearly 120,000 new residents who want to picnic, play ball, bike and hike.

Even if we count the recent addition of 379 acres, which is not open to the public, Prince William added only approximately 6 acres of parkland for every 1,000 residents, less than half the current goal of 14 parkland acres per 1,000 residents. No wonder we are way behind the curve.

Nevertheless, Planning staff recommends low standards and their report is based on the assumption that Prince William cannot afford adequate Parks and Open Space. There are always fiscal shortfalls. Starving our parks and open space is not a solution. By failing to act, we are shutting the door to a broad range of opportunities to secure adequate parkland and open space.

If the Board adopts low standards on February 26, the County would continue the policies and actions that have devalued the acquisition of parkland and open space through development negotiations, Capital Improvements Program expenditures, and partnership initiatives.
  • Should the County take advantage of existing opportunities to increase public parkland at virtually no cost to taxpayers?
    • Silver Lake
      The Board's approval of the Bull Run Mountain Conservancy (BRMC) proposal for Silver Lake would add 500 acres of parkland to the County inventory and open the entire 500 acres to the public for passive recreation at no cost to taxpayers.

      In order to include Silver Lake PLUS the additional 270 acres offered by BRMC in the County parkland inventory, the Board must add text to the current staff proposal:
      PK-POLICY 1: Preserve at least 15.0 acres per 1,000 population of Prince William County in county-owned or leased park land or privately owned park land where public uses and public access are controlled by the County through an enforceable contractual agreement.
    • Dove's Landing
      This 235-acre parcel is already owned by the County and minimal improvements would be required to open it to public use. It is a prime site for hiking and family nature outings that is comparable to the Metz Wetland on Neabsco Road, where bathroom and picnic facilities are not provided or needed. What is needed at Dove's Landing is the removal of the Public Land No Trespassing sign with a new sign that welcomes public uses.
  • Should state and federally owned parkland be included when setting County goals and standards?

    The Comprehensive Plan is a County document intended to guide County goals and actions, not state or federal goals or actions. Fairfax County does not include state, federal or regional parkland in their County parkland inventory, which includes 400 parks on 23,717 acres of land ( 9.4% of Fairfax County's landmass).

    The state and federal government secures parkland in locations that support their state and federal goals, with little if any input from County government. In addition, state and federal parkland uses as well as public access is determined by state and federal agencies, with little if any input from County government. State and federal investments cannot replace the need for a comprehensive network of parkland intended to serve the active and passive recreation needs of County residents, attract business investments and protect homeowner property values.
  • Should private parks that are owned and maintained by homeowner associations be included when setting County goals and standards?

    The Planning Commission and citizens want developers to proffer public parkland. Staff would prefer to give developers a credit for providing parks that will be open only to a specific set of homeowners, members of the developer-created Home Owner Associations (HOA's).
  • How much is enough?
    Planning Staff recommends 15 parkland acres per 1,000 residents
    Citizens and the Planning Commission recommend 25 parkland acres per 1,000 residents.

    Prince William's population is expected to grow to 556,300 residents by 2030... the period of time covered by the draft proposals for parks, trails and open space. Continued delays only increase the backlog and increase costs! In addition, high standards increase government attention to parkland and open space needs, attract partnership opportunities and significantly increase our local capacity to secure funding through grants and other funding support programs.

  • Should the County develop and adopt a Countywide Trail Network Plan?

    Both the Planning Commission and citizens have supported the development of a Countywide Trail Network Plan. Both have supported the forming of a Trail Commission. Citizens have recommended an independent commission that could serve as a focal point where County, VDOT and other trails could come together.

    A county that claims that it wants to be a great place to live, work, and play needs to plan for more than just asphalt trails built by VDOT along major roads.

Click here to email your ideas to all Supervisors.

Click here to read what Supervisors had to say at the January 15 2008 Worksession.